Originally posted by ThePinStripes
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
2021-2022 Off Season Thread
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by NelsonMuntz View Post
Yes, really. They’re going to sign a stop gap SS like Simmons, possibly trade for Olson (which would be the highlight of the offseason) and maybe add a lottery ticket starting pitcher. Otherwise it will be the same team they rolled out there last year, including Gardner. Why should we expect anything different? Start bracing yourself for “getting a healthy Hicks and Severino back will be just like a free agent signing.”Speak softly but carry a big stick.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Zimmer's Helmet View Post
Well, yeah. YES is already preparing for us for the inevitable. They wouldn't do this unless they knew he's coming back:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">You know what your phone needs right now? A little Brett Gardner, that’s what. <a href="https://t.co/OyzfMm5hLe">pic.twitter.com/OyzfMm5hLe</a></p>— YES Network (@YESNetwork) <a href="https://twitter.com/YESNetwork/status/1464660029659914247?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 27, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Comment
-
Originally posted by hhill View PostMullins is on the market.
https://www.nj.com/yankees/2021/11/m...de-market.html
Comment
-
Originally posted by ElectricStuff View Post
I'm completely lost on what kind of package it would take and doubting if the O's are even serious about it.
You wanna know what? You gotta problem with Luis Cessa, you gotta problem with me. And I suggest you let that one marinate
Comment
-
Originally posted by fredgmuggs View Post
I know given his age and health he's not as active in his ownership of the Orioles, but I can't see Peter Angelos, if he still has breath in his body, allowing a deal with the Yankees for one of their high profile players unless he's getting a king's ransom in return. And even then it's still iffy.
never mind."Glory is fleeting, but obscurity is forever." - Napoleon Bonaparte (1769-1821)
Comment
-
BAL is looking for players who can play now. Unless they take Hicks it's going to be too expensive. We have other holes that are more important (starting catcher and #2 LHP SP, SS, 1st) I don't like Hicks/probably Gardy and I have no problem with Gallo or Judge in CF, Florial (I wanted Allen) and Hicks as 4th. I hope this is just PR. The post on Hicks with Mets having 4 more years I had to check (he was right). I always felt Ells was a contract that was terrible from day one. Forgetting the money but Ells had 3 years of the 4 he played over 100 game so 3 for 6 (I am sure it was settled we paid him for 6) total 520 games. Hicks played 493 in 6 years and only 2 years over 100 games. It is hard to believe Ells played more games in 4 years (we paid him 6) years than Hicks did in 6 ...... These contracts hurt the team.
Doesn't make sense. IMO. Unless we trade Sanchez and Hicks we have a roster problem. We are not having 5 OFers(Hicks and Mullins) and Sanchez a backup.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bucky View PostBAL is looking for players who can play now. Unless they take Hicks it's going to be too expensive. We have other holes that are more important (starting catcher and #2 LHP SP, SS, 1st) I don't like Hicks/probably Gardy and I have no problem with Gallo or Judge in CF, Florial (I wanted Allen) and Hicks as 4th. I hope this is just PR. The post on Hicks with Mets having 4 more years I had to check (he was right). I always felt Ells was a contract that was terrible from day one. Forgetting the money but Ells had 3 years of the 4 he played over 100 game so 3 for 6 (I am sure it was settled we paid him for 6) total 520 games. Hicks played 493 in 6 years and only 2 years over 100 games. It is hard to believe Ells played more games in 4 years (we paid him 6) years than Hicks did in 6 ...... These contracts hurt the team.
Doesn't make sense. IMO. Unless we trade Sanchez and Hicks we have a roster problem. We are not having 5 OFers(Hicks and Mullins) and Sanchez a backup.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bucky View PostBAL is looking for players who can play now. Unless they take Hicks it's going to be too expensive. We have other holes that are more important (starting catcher and #2 LHP SP, SS, 1st) I don't like Hicks/probably Gardy and I have no problem with Gallo or Judge in CF, Florial (I wanted Allen) and Hicks as 4th. I hope this is just PR. The post on Hicks with Mets having 4 more years I had to check (he was right). I always felt Ells was a contract that was terrible from day one. Forgetting the money but Ells had 3 years of the 4 he played over 100 game so 3 for 6 (I am sure it was settled we paid him for 6) total 520 games. Hicks played 493 in 6 years and only 2 years over 100 games. It is hard to believe Ells played more games in 4 years (we paid him 6) years than Hicks did in 6 ...... These contracts hurt the team.
Doesn't make sense. IMO. Unless we trade Sanchez and Hicks we have a roster problem. We are not having 5 OFers(Hicks and Mullins) and Sanchez a backup.
Comment
Comment