Originally posted by jnewmark
View Post
Re the famous incident--https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k8UjLR5nvx0-- where Molina looks all around him for the ball only to find it sticking to his chest protector: surely the substance at issue was not rosin but Spider T. or something comparable to it. Was the ball loaded by the pitcher that day? Can the catcher, rather than the pitcher, somehow load the ball? Or was it just a meaningless oddity of Mama Nature that made the ball stick? I'd say that any substance that's capable of making a ball that sticky should be banned. However, as others have noted here, the hitters seem able to pine tar up with impunity. They might say this helps keeping a flying bat from braining a player, an ump, or even a spectator. The pitchers can reply that, well, rosin helps them not to hit the batters.
It's utterly unlikely that MLB will ban the use of pine tar on bats. They might, though, look into some slight upgrade in stickiness to the rosin bag. Both substances provide a certain safety, but does the pine tar provide a performance advantage to hitters that rosin does not provide to the pitchers? Hell if I know.
Comment